![]() Maybe I'm a unix crank, but I've always tried to keep cola as more of a mediator over individual best-of-breed tools, whenever it made the most sense, rather than re-implementing things that already exist in better forms elsewhere.įor diffs we show inline diffs for interactive staging, one of our uniquely ergonomic features, while also making it extremely easy to launch `git difftool`. ![]() I have a slightly different philosophy implementation-wise, though. Hi, author of git-cola here, and I completely agree that these features are key. and if i'm going to even consider using that in a production environment I'd rather have a more serious T&C that will make me feel a bit safe that this thing will be supported and will live on for a few years ahead and not die, "It's just a beta" is something i'm really tired of hearing as an excuse to a crippled product, gmail was in beta for way to long and it was superior to all existing email solutions at the time, no one would've used it if it only supported sending and receiving emails, I wouldn't call his git client a beta either, it's more of an alpha experimental product IMHO. This doesn't seem to be exactly a FLOSS per say, but I get your point, they're just doing it the wrong way, if you're gonna start something that you want to be on par with other tools, at least get out your beta with the same features, then add up on that post beta, but they're not doing that, they're releasing a GUI tool that has the basics of git, with videos and js animations. And pretty much all FLOSS software excuses itself from any kind of warranty too. What do you want them to do, NOT release a beta? Fair enough if so, but a lot of software is released this way. The T's & C's pretty much translate as "it's a beta". so yes, it's a tool for people who don't want to use the CLI properly. GUIs exist get over it.Ī simple google search for "How to use git without command line" will show you the amount of people who are looking for just that, I said most, not all, I believe git is a developer tool that's mostly used by dev who can navigate their way around CLI, lately i've seen and worked with non devs who want to just use GUI tools to help them around without having to know the details of what's going under the hood, this submission is a good example of that, it lacks every single tool that a developer that works in a big team with a big codebase needs. >Ridiculously arrogant comment with nothing to back it up. ![]() How do you expect to compete with other existing and stable products ? I'm not trying to sound harsh, this is just my views and I think I've got a point right? The Product may not operate correctly and may be substantially modified prior to first commercial release, or at Company’s option may not be released commercially in the future. >This Product is a beta release offering and is not at the level of performance of a commercially available product offering. >Company grants Recipient a nonexclusive, nontransferable license to use the GitKraken (“Product”) for a period designated by the Company for the purpose of testing and evaluating the Product. I personally never use GUI clients for git, the CLI does exactly what it's supposed to do, efficiently, quickly in a stable reproducible manner, most GUI clients are for people who just don't want to learn to use the CLI properly.Ģ-Easy on the Luxury, we're devs not divasģ-The beta agreement is just way too scary to take the product seriously, examples: The only caveat I have is, even if your product is the best, if your company is shifty or a bad actor- I'll do whatever I can to avoid it. If the price difference is justified by my effctiveness with your tool, I'm spending the money without hesitation. It's the same reason I choose IntelliJ over Eclipse or other IDEs. If people didn't pay me to build the software that _I_ build, this wouldn't be possible. I use it all day every day and the work I do with it allows my wife to stay home with my kids. I don't feel like $70 is very much for something that feeds my family. I'm sure most of my dislike is illogical at this point, but it still is there. ![]() Maybe because it's such a Windows feeling application. Maybe because I'd been using Tower for nearly a year by the time I came across SourceTree. That is to say, I don't feel like anything they do sucks, some things I really like, some things I'm meh about. It's funny because I generally regard Atlassian products as at the worst, not bad.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |